he results of longstanding research on a secret society were presented at the European Parliament on Tuesday by Daniel Estulin, author of the bestseller “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group.” Secretive and elite – the Bilderberg group, which unites some of the world’s most powerful people, has been meeting behind closed doors for decades. Its activities have become shrouded in a mist of conspiracy theories, with some claiming its members are trying to create a new world order. Investigative journalist Daniel Estulin has just revealed to the European Parliament all he claims to have discovered about the ‘Bilderbergers’. “Over almost 20 years of research I’ve found out that what today is called the Bilderberg group already existed over eight hundred years ago,” Estulin told RT. “Back then they were called the Venetian black nobility. Bilderberg is the creation of the Sinarchy movement who are very potentially founders and financiers of Hitler. As Sinarchy international they, in turn, were founded by the Free Mason esoteric secret society back in the 1770s, as a kind of a counter attack on the principals upon which the United States of America was built.“A lot of people speak of Bilderberg as a domain of conspiracy theories, and of course it’s not, it’s a historical fact,” Estulin stated. “A lot of people believe that Bilderberg is a one-world government or creating the new world order, especially people point out a speech made by George W. Bush made back in the 1990s about the creation of one world government. It’s actually not about that at all. It’s a meeting of people who represent a particular ideology. That ideology is of money.“So the idea is not to create one world government rather the creation of one world company limited to where financial concerns are far more powerful than any government on Earth,” the journalist added.
www.allvoices.com
Brussels Press Conference Daniel Estulin
adies and gentlemen, We are now in a position to change history. I finally believe that mankind has a future. A once demoralised population with no moral purpose is coming out of their prolonged slumber. In this general awakening, people are beginning to ask the right questions. It´s no longer, “what will I get out of it?” but rather “What´s right?” It´s an international phenomenon of response and reaction to an overly felt perception that the entire world is doomed to catastrophe, unless we the people do something about it. I have written a book on the subject of the Bilderberg Group. This book, in a way, has become the catalyst for a movement around the world. Now, we don´t have a lot of time, so I would like to explain to you what Bilderberg is and why it must be stopped. In the world of international finance, there are those who steer the events and those who react to the events. While the latter are better known, greater in numbers, and seemingly more powerful, the true power rests with the former. At the centre of the global financial system are the financial oligarchy today represented by the Bilderberg group. Bilderberg organization is dynamic, in that it changes with the times, absorbs and cerates new parts while excreting the remains of the decaying parts. Members come and go, but the system itself has not changed. It is a self-perpetuating system, a virtual spider web of interlocked financial, political, economic and industry interests. Now, Bilderberg isn´t a secret society. It is not an evil, all-seeing eye. There is no conspiracy even though a lot of people with their infantile fantasies see it as such. No group of people, and I don’t care how powerful they are, sit around the table in dark room, holding hands, staring at a crystal ball, planning the world´s future. It´s a meeting of people who represent a certain ideology. Not OWG or NWO as too many people mistakenly believe. Rather, the ideology is of a ONE WORLD COMPANY LIMITED. Back in 1968, at a Bilderberg meeting in Canada, George Ball, the then Under-secretary for Economic Affairs with JFK and Johnson said: “Where does one find a legitimate base for the power of corporate management to make decisions that can profoundly affect the economic life of nations to whose governments they have only limited responsibility?” The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call THE ARISTOCRACY OF PURPOSE between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity, obviously from their vantage point, for our own good and in our benefit – THE GREAT UNWASHED AS THEY CALL US. Now, the reason people don’t believe in Bilderberg and other organisations working together exercising such control on the world stage is that theirs is a Cartesian fantasy world, in which the isolated intentions of some individuals, NOT the dynamics of social processes shape the course of history as the movement of evolving ideas and themes over successive generations and even centuries. Bilderberg is a medium of bringing together financial institutions which are the world´s most powerful and most predatory financial interests. And at this time, it is that combination which is the worst enemy of humanity. We can all congratulate ourselves in that today, Bilderberg has become the mainstay of corporate media. Not because corporate media has suddenly remembered their responsibility to us, but because we the people, have forced them into this uncomfortable position by becoming very aware that Presidents and Prime Ministers and your little shrinking Queens and Kings are puppets of powerful forces working from behind the scenes. Something has happened to us, the people in the midst of this general economic collapse. People at large are gripped by something they don’t always understand. But, it compels them to act in a certain way, in their own interest. That´s what they are doing in Greece. That’s what they are doing in Spain, in the United States. It´s called the anthropic principle. It´s like a tidal movement came upon us and washed our fears away. As people realise that their existence is threatened, they have lost their fear, and Bilderberg and others sense it. Perhaps that´s why at a recent Council on Foreign Relations speech in Montreal, Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of the founders of the TC, warned that a “global political awakening,” in combination with infighting amongst the elite, was threatening to derail the move towards a one world government. You see people at this table come from very different ideological and political backgrounds. What unites us, however, is that we are all patriots. And those who oppose us, those who work for secret societies, who have sold their nations out for a pound of flesh, are traitors. Not only traitors of their people and nations, but of humanity as a whole. Now, the subject of this Press Conference is Bilderberg: Towards One World Company Ltd. About six and a half centuries ago, the economy of Europe had collapsed into what is known as Europe´s “New Dark Age”, the greatest economic and demographic collapse of Europe since the collapse of the Roman Empire. Then, in the middle of the 14C, much of the power of the oligarchy abruptly disintegrated. This disintegration erupted as the sudden, chain-reaction collapse of the worst financial bubble of debt speculation in history, until now, that is, when the banking houses of Bardi and Peruzzi went under. This disintegration and collapse of the Lombard debt bubble caused a collapse in the power among the oligarchical families. What does it have to do with Bilderberg? Modern history superseded medieval history at that moment that the institutions which singularly distinguish modern from medieval history were put into place. That occurred back in 1439 at the Council of Florence. What were those new institutions?
1) The conception of the modern nation state republics under the government of natural law.
2) The central role of the fostering of scientific and technological progress as the mandate given to the republic.
These two ideals represent a crucial argument: their existence as institution, in any part of Europe, changed everything in all of Europe because these institutional changes increased the rate of development of per-capita and per-square kilometre of mankind over nature. So, no nation could afford not to progress, not to develop for the fear of being left hopelessly behind. The first success occurred under France´s Louis XI, who doubled the per-capita income of France, and defeated all of France´s enemies. Louis XI success sparked a chain reaction of efforts to establish a nation-state on this model in Henry VII´s England and elsewhere. Another key idea to come out of Council of Florence which was later implemented in the United States is a universal principle of GENERAL WELFARE, on which all modern civilised society is based. Now, welfare does not mean a useless bum sitting on the couch, eating a pizza, slobbering all over himself, watching television, while he is waiting for an unemployment check to arrive. It is a question of immortality. What´s the intention of the existence of man, and government? It´s to provide for the welfare, of future generations of mankind. To assure our survival as the species. The principle of the General Welfare, as expressed in summation in the preamble of the Federal Constitution of the United States, is the fundamental law. So, how is it related to today? These people want an Empire. That´s what globalization is. And too many people believe that in order to have an Empire, you need money. You have all heard of the phrase – THE MONEY ELITE. But money, is not a determinant of wealth and the economy. Money does not make the world go around. Money has no intrinsic value. Human mind affects the development of the planet. This is how mankind is measured. This is the true meaning of IMMORTALITY. What separates us from animals is our ability to discover universal physical principles. It allows us to innovate, which subsequently improves the lives of people by increasing the power of man over nature. You see, they are destroying the world economy on purpose. This isn´t the first time either. This was done in the 14th century New Dark Age: 30% of the population wiped out. Empire=dumb people down. They want to destroy the creative powers of reason. 0 growth, 0 progress. Club of Rome (Limits to Growth) 1973 PROJECT 1980S CFR, promoting controlled disintegration of the world economy. BILDERBERG 1995. Demand destruction. How? By destroying the world economy on purpose. GREAT DEPRESSION – TRANSFER OF WEALTH. The Great Depression was not an event that wiped out U.S. capitalists. It was an event that made the rich even richer by transferring the wealth of the people into the hands of the already wealthy. That´s how Bank of America made their billions through real estate foreclosures from 1929-37. Don’t believe for a minute that the richest of the rich will be hurt by the coming collapse. The only ones hurt will be you and me. Look at Greece. What they are trying to do is blow up the system by, instead of allowing Greece to reorganise its money system, they are imposing that Greece be used, that the Greek debt be bailed out by Europe. But, that debt is worthless. It´s garbage, it´s monopoly money. So, asking Europe, which is going through its own financial meltdown, to absorb an unpayable debt, which the Greeks, by the way, can NEVER repay, means you are going to FOR SURE, destroy Europe. And, it is being done on purpose, because nobody, not even Barroso, who with all due respect to him is absolutly intellectually challenged or Trichet are that stupid. Let´s get rid of the bureaucracy in Brussels. Let´s fire them all. They are bums. They are useless. These people have never done anything useful in their lives. Get rid of Barroso. He failed history in high school. Get rid of the “wet rag,” Van Rumpey not because he is useless but because he is evil and very dangerous. It´s not the first time that an unloved, short, evil little man has gnawed his way into the bowels of power. You see, it is a question of leadership and a question of immortality. All of the leaders of society, especially in times of crisis, are leaders because they measure up to some approximation of that standard. People such as Barroso, Van Rumpey, EU President Jean Claude Juncker, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the managing director of the IMF can hardly be considered leaders. In fact, they can hardly be considered humans, from the perspective of human representing A GREATER GOOD OF HUMANITY. Now, what I am talking about is not a scientific problem or economic question, but rather a morality question. A question of immortality. Do we as nation states, as people of the Planet believe in the future of mankind? And what kind of future will we have 100 or 200 years in the future. What about 10,000 years from now? Do we have a right to dream? If we have a sense of purpose for being here, then the bad guys can´t win. For example, we have been told that euro must be saved. That euro´s failure will bring down the European Union. That´s a lie. Instead of a weak, dysfunctional European monetary union, we go back to being independent nation state republics – Europe of the Fatherlands. Cultural diversity is not only humanity’s hallmark of progress, but an insurance policy against extinction as a species. Once born, a nation state concept never dies; it only waits for courageous and sane human beings to come to its defence, to perfect the concept. So therefore, we should be a fraternity of nations, of sovereign nations—united by a common purpose for humanity. Until we can bring mankind into the Age of Reason, history will be shaped in actuality, not by the wills of masses of humanity, but by the mere handfuls who, for purposes of good or evil, steer the fate of mankind generally as herds of cows are steered to and from the pasture—and, occasionally, also to the slaughter-house.
ABOUT MR.DANIEL ESTULIN:
Born in Russi, is an author, public speaker, investigative journalist and author of conspiracy books about the Bilderberg Group, an annual invitation-only conference of the elites in the fields of business, finance, media, military and politics. He is known for his extensive works on this group having written a book called “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group” as well as for his live seminars throughout the world. In an interview, Estulin describes his background, which led him to his profession: “I’m a Russian expatriate who was kicked out of the Soviet Union in 1980. My father was a dissident who fought for freedom of speech who was jailed, tortured by the KGB. Suffered two political deaths. When these people got tired of us they threw us out. We moved to Canada and 12 years ago I came to Spain. My grandfather was a colonel in the KGB and the counter-intelligence in the 1950s, so I am privileged somewhat to get a lot of the information from secret service which are our best sources of information. Not only the KGB people but the MI6 people, the CIA because most of the people who work for the secret service as you probably know are patriots and they love their country and they’re doing it for the good of the nation and they’re the first ones absolutely terrified of the plans of the Bilderbergers”. Estulin wrote The True Story of the Bilderberg Group (original title: La Verdadera Historia Del Club Bilderberg), purportedly a report on the nature and meetings of the world’s most powerful people. According to Estulin’s book, the secretive Bilderbergers have been making major important political, economical and social decisions since their first gathering in 1954. Commenting on an episode in this book, Bruce Ramsey wrote “The method here is to initiate the reader into a special group of in-the-know; of mixing facts with assertions so that the casual reader won’t tell them apart, and to draw lines between A and B, when A is the person you want to impeach and B is a known wickedness.” Estulin published a second book, Los secretos del club Bilderberg, released in September 2006. The English version, The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club, was released in the US on September 22, 2007. In December 2007, Estulin appeared on the Alex Jones Show, and claimed that he had “received information from sources inside the U.S. intelligence community which suggests that people from the highest levels of the U.S. government are considering an assassination attempt against Congressman Ron Paul because they are threatened by his burgeoning popularity” as a presidential candidate. Estulin has worked with American journalist Big Jim Tucker who has a similar interest in the activities of the Bilderberg Group. (Wikipedia). For more information about his work please visit Mr. Estulin’s website at the link below:
www.danielestulin.com
OUR COMMENTS:
Really interesting document, and very curious research. We don’t know so much about this argument, but for sure is very interesting. We are going to read Mr. Estulin’s book for sure, and keep informed about this so cool argument. But…is another think that capture our attention immediately seeing the pictures of this conference. At the beginning we had the impression that we make a confusion. But then, we pay much more attention and realize that close to Mr. Estulin is sitting the Italian Mario Borghezio (?) So as we know him very well from the past and his political activity in Lega Lombarda…well, now become difficult to estimate positively M Estulin’s work. If they are from the same part, means they are similar. Italians use to say: “ Dimmi con chi ai e ti dirò chi sei “… For those who don’t know Mr. Borghezio’s bio, here below they can read a short snack from Wikipedia. (unfortunately in Italian, so we suggest to use Google translation if necessary because the document it’s very interesting ) … We don’t want to make any comments. So you are free to make your own. (5)
Mr. MARIO BORGHEZIO’s biography:
Laureato in giurisprudenza, esponente della Lega Nord, è stato consigliere comunale di Torino, deputato alla Camera dal 1992 al 2001, sottosegretario alla Giustizia nel 1994 durante il primo governo Berlusconi. È stato anche Presidente del cosiddetto “Governo della Padania” dal 1999 al 2004. Prima di far parte della Lega Nord, ha avuto esperienze sia nel movimento monarchico che negli ambienti dell’estrema destra extraparlamentare. Ha affermato di avere militato da giovane nel movimento Jeune Europe (movimento internazionale di ispirazione “nazionalrivoluzionaria” fondato da Jean Thiriart). Attualmente è deputato del Parlamento europeo, di cui è membro dal 2001, e al quale è stato rieletto nel 2004 per la lista della Lega Nord nella circoscrizione Nord-Ovest, ricevendo 35.000 preferenze; è stato rieletto nelle elezioni europee del 2009 con 48.290 preferenze. Iscritto inizialmente, così come gli altri parlamentari della Lega, al gruppo euroscettico nazionalista Indipendenza e Democrazia, dal 27 aprile 2006 è passato tra i membri non iscritti. Nel marzo 2006, infatti “Indipendenza e Democrazia” aveva espulso temporaneamente i parlamentari della Lega per divergenze sulla gestione dei fondi del gruppo e a causa delle provocazioni di Roberto Calderoli in seguito alla pubblicazione delle caricature di Maometto sul Jyllands-Posten che hanno portato alle dimissioni di quest’ultimo dal governo.
In seguito si è iscritto all’eurogruppo Unione per l’Europa delle nazioni. Borghezio è membro della Commissione per le libertà civili, la giustizia e gli affari interni; della Commissione per le petizioni; della Commissione per il mercato interno e la protezione dei consumatori; della Commissione per l’industria, la ricerca e l’energia; della Delegazione alla commissione parlamentare mista UE-Romania; della Delegazione all’Assemblea parlamentare paritetica ACP-UE. Nell’agosto 2009 dichiara a Radio Padania Libera che avrebbe chiesto «in sede europea che tutti gli stati membri tolgano il segreto apposto sugli avvistamenti Ufo, e mi adopererò affinché anche coloro che ci rappresentano al Consiglio d’Europa facciano la stessa cosa». L’11 Luglio 1976 viene fermato dalle autorità a Ponte San Luigi, valico di confine nei pressi di Ventimiglia, e trovato in possesso di una cartolina firmata “Ordine Nuovo” ed indirizzata “al bastardo Luciano Violante” (magistrato allora impegnato in inchieste contro l’eversione di matrice neofascista). Il testo del messaggio, accompagnato da alcune svastiche e da un “Viva Hitler”, era il seguente: “1, 10, 100, 1000 Occorsio”. Vittorio Occorsio, anch’egli giudice protagonista della lotta contro il terrorismo nero, era stato ucciso appena due giorni prima in un agguato. Nel 1993 è stato condannato a pagare una multa di 750.000 lire per violenza privata su un minore in relazione ad un episodio risalente al 1991, quando aveva trattenuto per un braccio un venditore ambulante marocchino, illegalmente in Italia, di 12 anni per consegnarlo ai carabinieri. Nel 1998 fonda insieme a Max Bastoni, Omar Tonani ed Enrico Pau i Volontari Verdi, associazione vicina alla Lega Nord passata alla storia per le famosissime ronde, che presero il via proprio da quella fondazione. Il 1° luglio 2000, al termine di una fiaccolata antidroga del «Coordinamento Piemonte dei volontari verdi», Borghezio viene ritenuto responsabile insieme ad altri sette leghisti dell’incendio scoppiato presso i pagliericci di alcuni immigrati che dormivano sotto il ponte Principessa Clotilde a Torino. Per questo gesto verrà rinviato a giudizio e condannato in via definitiva dalla Cassazione nel luglio 2005 a due mesi e venti giorni di reclusione, commutati poi in una multa di 3.040 euro per concorso nel reato di danneggiamento seguito da incendio. Secondo quanto riferito dallo stesso Borghezio l’incendio sarebbe stato invece causato accidentalmente da una torcia caduta di mano ad un militante leghista durante la ronda. Il 19 gennaio 2001 è stato aggredito su un tram in centro a Torino e colpito da uno sconosciuto, che poi è fuggito a piedi.
Nel luglio del 2005, durante un intervento del Presidente della Repubblica Carlo Azeglio Ciampi al Parlamento Europeo si è reso protagonista, insieme ad altri parlamentari della Lega Nord, di una vivace contestazione contro l’introduzione dell’euro, da lui considerata colpevole dello stato di crisi dell’economia italiana. Per questo motivo è stato fatto allontanare dall’aula. La sera del 17 dicembre del 2005 balza alle cronache per un pestaggio subito in treno sulla tratta Torino-Milano per mano di un gruppo di facinorosi. Riconosciuto il parlamentare europeo in uno scompartimento, un gruppo di no-global lo ha raggiunto e ha iniziato a percuoterlo minacciando di gettarlo dal treno in corsa. La tragedia è stata evitata dall’intervento di due agenti in borghese della Polizia Ferroviaria che nello scontro hanno riportato gravi contusioni. Il referto medico per l’esponente leghista, emesso al momento del ricovero all’ospedale di Chivasso, riportava di una “frattura ossea nasale e trauma cervicale distrattivo” con trenta giorni di prognosi. Borghezio e i no-global avevano preso parte a due distinte manifestazioni NO-TAV in Val di Susa. I Carabinieri avevano sconsigliato in precedenza a Borghezio di salire su quel treno, considerandolo, vista la situazione, poco sicuro.A febbraio 2006 la situazione si ripete a Livorno, dove Borghezio stava tenendo un comizio organizzato dalla Lega Nord Toscana; fuori dalla sala civica si raccoglie una manifestazione di un centinaio di no global e di frange estremiste degli ultrà livornesi, dispersa dalla forze dell’ordine.
Il giorno 11 settembre 2007, 6° anniversario dell’attentato alle Torri Gemelle, l’eurodeputato leghista è stato fermato dalla polizia prima di una manifestazione contro l’islamizzazione dell’Europa a Bruxelles. Borghezio racconta di essere stato malmenato, prima di essere fermato insieme a un’altra ventina di persone. In realtà i fermati sono oltre 150, compresi il leghista, il leader e il presidente del partito fiammingo di estrema destra, il Vlaams Belang, Filip Dewinter e Frank Vanhecke. Tutti i fermati sono stati caricati su furgoni con i vetri oscurati e portati al Palazzo di Giustizia. Poco dopo le 18 Borghezio ha lasciato il palazzo di giustizia di Bruxelles. La manifestazione anti-Islam era stata vietata dal comune di Bruxelles, nonostante ciò gli organizzatori (riuniti dalla sigla Stop the islamization of Europe) avevano annunciato che l’avrebbero comunque attuata. Il 21 marzo 2008 ha partecipato al “Congresso contro l’islamizzazione” a Colonia indetto dal movimento locale di destra Pro Köln. Il sindaco di Colonia, Fritz Schramm, definì i manifestanti dei non benvenuti “facinorosi camuffati da benpensanti, razzisti in abiti civili”. La polizia tedesca sciolse la manifestazione per ragioni di ordine pubblico, trascinado via a forza Borghezio dal palco. Roberto Calderoli e Roberto Castelli presero le distanze sostenendo che la partecipazione di Borghezio era avvenuta “a titolo personale”. Nel 2009 è apparso in una videoinchiesta di Canal+ dal titolo Europe: ascenseur pour les fachos (Europa: ascensore per i fascisti). Invitato nella sua veste di parlamentare europeo della Lega Nord ad un «incontro di formazione» del movimento nizzardo identitario francese ‘Nissa Rebela’ (considerato di estrema destra dai media francesi), lo si nota al termine del suo accorato intervento mentre si ferma a parlare con alcune persone dando loro dei consigli per conquistare il potere gradualmente, penetrando nelle istituzioni, senza però essere etichettati come fascisti. L’operatore riesce ad avvicinare Borghezio, che testualmente dice ad alcuni militanti: « Bisogna rientrare nelle amministrazioni dei piccoli comuni. Dovete insistere molto sull’aspetto regionalista del movimento. Ci sono delle buone maniere per non essere etichettati come fascisti nostalgici, ma come un nuovo movimento regionale, cattolico, eccetera, ma sotto sotto rimanere gli stessi. » (Mario Borghezio). In Italia, il video non è stato notato dai media, salvo un comunicato stampa di Jacopo Venier (Comunisti Italiani) e una citazione sul quotidiano l’Unità e su La7 tv. Il video appare anche all’interno del sito dell’MpS di Nichi Vendola. È stato attraverso Internet e il network Youblob che l’episodio ha avuto una certa diffusione tra i maggiori blog e aggregatori di notizie.
( Wikipedia )
